InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,035.69
(
-1.57%
)
US TECH 100
17,119.40
(
-1.10%
)
Dow Jones
37,815.92
(
-1.49%
)
Brent Oil
86.02
(
-1.46%
)
Bitcoin
59,672.11
(
-6.53%
)
Post# of 108590
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

VapeDog

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 41
Posts 2388
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/10/2016

VapeDog

Re: LongFutureShot post# 108558

Thursday, 02/03/2022 9:33:18 PM

Thursday, February 03, 2022 9:33:18 PM

Post# of 108590
There’s something I’ve always scratched my head about and it occurred 3/15/2019… so the next time you speak to Hansen ask his opinion on this ***Fine Print*** below…

“Although the initial decision in this matter also concerned Solaris Power Cells, Inc., Solaris settled with the Commission after the initial decision issued. This notice does not apply to Solaris Power Cells, Inc.”

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2019/34-85337.pdf

Just looking for a legal translation…

My only question is WHY???… WHY bother ???

Plausible Baby !!!
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up